Intimacy and Jealousy Regulate Relationships

Uploaded 10/30/2018, approx. 6 minute read

Summary

In relationships, there are two ways to regulate behavior: intimacy and romantic jealousy. Healthy relationships achieve a balance between the two, but those with mood disorders or personality disorders cannot achieve intimacy and instead become fused together. To prevent abandonment, the partner may provoke romantic jealousy, but this can lead to the exact opposite effect and drive the other partner away. Finding the balance between intimacy and jealousy is difficult, and exaggerated regulatory behaviors can kill the relationship. The modern condition is that many people give up on relationships altogether.

Tags

By popular demand, my name is Sam Vaknin, and I am the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited.

And don’t you make me repeat this.


Today we are going to discuss regulatory loops.

Every relationship has mechanisms for feedback. The partners in the relationship use these mechanisms to communicate with each other and to modify the other partner’s behavior to regulate the relationship.

There are two ways to do that, via intimacy or via romantic jealousy. Mature partners achieve a workable balance between togetherness and personal autonomy. It is not easy.

Taken to the extreme, personal autonomy becomes a freedom and then anarchy. Taken to the extreme, togetherness becomes clinging, suffocating and stifling.

Finding the golden mean between these two is a task of herculean proportions. It requires awareness of subtleties and nuances. It requires fine tuning on a minute by minute basis, interaction by interaction, speech act by speech act. It’s a full-time job.

But these mature healthy partners engender intimacy via communication and also via actions. They signal to each other. Intimacy feels so good, so warm, involves acceptance and creates such a safe and secure environment in which the partners can be vulnerable, naked, so to speak. So it feels so good.

It feels like going back to childhood that no one in his right mind wants to exit such a bond, an intimate, a truly intimate bond.

So both abandonment or separation anxiety and romantic jealousy are absent in healthy relationships because intimacy guarantees that there’s no need for them.

Object permanence or object constancy is accomplished and established in healthy and mature relationships. The partners trust each other to always be there. Separation is not a threat. And abandonment is not on the cards because who would abandon, again, a truly intimate functional relationship? Why would you do that?

So such a relationship is devoid of anxiety and devoid of jealousy.

But what to do? What happens when one of the partners is a codependent or a borderline and the other one is a narcissist or a psychopath or a histrionic? These are very common combinations, actually.

And what happens when both of the partners suffer from mood disorders such as, for example, bipolar disorder?

Well, these kind of partners cannot achieveand if they do achieve, cannot maintain even minimal intimacy.

Instead, what they do, they mesh, intermesh, get entangled, fuse, merge. They become a single organism with two heads.

Normally, such fusion fosters intolerable abandonment or separation anxiety. It’s very simple. If you’re part of one organism, any separation is the equivalent of amputation. It’s intolerably painful. It could even be life threatening with profuse, emotional bleeding taking place.

So all separation, even minimal, is perceived as an existential threat.

The only way to regulate this kind of profound anxiety is to make sure that the partner doesn’t jump ship, doesn’t abandon you.

But how do you achieve that if you cannot generate intimacy? What incentive or inducement does the partner have to stay in their relationship?

If he’s a narcissist, you can give him narcissistic supply. But even that has a limit. At some point, he may devalue you, or he may find a much better source of supply.

So it’s not a guarantee as far as the longevity of a relationship.


So how do you kind of make sure that your spouse or intimate partner remains heavily involved, emotionally invested, infectious, and will never leave you?

This is done by provoking the partner’s romantic jealousy.

Jealousy, of course, is a reaction to anticipated loss. So the partner that provokes jealousy, engages in indiscreet extramarital affairs, adultery, and cheating. She displays flagrant promiscuity. She is ostentatiously flirtatious or seductive with strangers. Her behaviors are provocative, as is her dress, her attire, or her speech. And she all the time destabilizes the relationship by hinting at the existence of third parties by generating a doom and gloom atmosphere of an impending breakup. And she does that in order to provoke the partner into sitting up and paying attention. She wants the partner to value her. She wants the partner to realize that she’s desirable, that she’s irresistible to other men, or that he’s irresistible and desirable to other women.

Such a partner introduces insecurity and instability as means to create security and stability.

It’s very paradoxical. The instigator wants her counterpart, actually, to set boundaries.

She wants, or he wants, his or her spouse to put his foot down, to prove that he cares, to say up to here, stop it. I don’t accept your behavior anymore.

She wants the partner to wake up, to become alive, to become invested in the relationship, to pay attention, as I said. Of course, such behaviors, provoking romantic jealousy, triangulation, such behavior precipitate exactly what they had been meant to prevent. They have the exact opposite effect to the one intended.

Many partners anticipating loss and with pain aversion, many. These combine to drive the injured party away, actually guarantee eventual separation and abandonment.

If you play this game of romantic jealousy too often, if you triangulate too often, if you introduce the parties into the relationship too often, by cheating, for example, if you are flagrantly promiscuous, ostentatiously flirtatious, or seductive in public, if you misbehave, if you dress provocatively, if you upload photos of yourself half naked or online, and if you constantly hint that you’re about, just about, a second before breaking up and walking away. At some point, you’re taking the risk that your partner may say, well, good riddance. I can’t take this anymore.

So, exactly like with intimacy, it’s an act of fine tuning. You have to find the balance between provoking enough insecurity and not too much of it.

Again, exactly like intimacy. You have to find the balance between creating enough intimacy and not too much of it.

Exaggerated regulatory behaviors, intimacy creating or jealousy creating, tend to kill the relationship, to terminate it, because no one in his right mind wants to live in an exaggerated, caricaturistic environment.

People seek the middle ground. People want to feel sufficiently themselves and sufficiently merged with the other. They want to create a third entity within which both partners are separate but united.

Not easy.

And that’s why well over 50% of marriages end in divorces and well over 80% of relationships end in separation.

Finding this balance, this middle ground, this golden mean, eludes most of us and it eludes most of us because of our inherent narcissism, including healthy narcissism. We don’t know exactly how to keep our partner happy and ourselves at the same time. We keep failing.

The situation is so bad that many people give up all together and that’s the service statement about the modern condition that anyone could make.

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Summary Link:

https://vakninsummaries.com/ (Full summaries of Sam Vaknin’s videos)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html (My work in psychology: Media Kit and Press Room)

Bonus Consultations with Sam Vaknin or Lidija Rangelovska (or both) http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/ctcounsel.html

http://www.youtube.com/samvaknin (Narcissists, Psychopaths, Abuse)

http://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings (World in Conflict and Transition)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com (Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/cv.html (Biography and Resume)

Summary

In relationships, there are two ways to regulate behavior: intimacy and romantic jealousy. Healthy relationships achieve a balance between the two, but those with mood disorders or personality disorders cannot achieve intimacy and instead become fused together. To prevent abandonment, the partner may provoke romantic jealousy, but this can lead to the exact opposite effect and drive the other partner away. Finding the balance between intimacy and jealousy is difficult, and exaggerated regulatory behaviors can kill the relationship. The modern condition is that many people give up on relationships altogether.

Tags

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Are All Gamblers Narcissists? (+Sports Betting) (Gambling Disorder with Brian Pempus)

The discussion explored the complex psychological dynamics of gambling disorder, distinguishing it from professional gambling and emphasizing its nature as a process addiction linked to reward systems rather than impulse control or compulsion. The conversation highlighted strong associations between gambling disorder and personality disorders like narcissistic, antisocial, and borderline personality

Read More »

From Drama, Recklessness to Risk Aversion (in Psychopathic Personalities)

The discussion focused on the behavioral evolution of individuals with psychopathic and narcissistic traits, highlighting how their reckless, thrill-seeking behaviors tend to diminish with age, often transforming into more pro-social, risk-averse tendencies. This transition is theorized to involve neurobiological changes and the psychological process of sublimation, where aggressive impulses are

Read More »

Intoxicated in Narcissist’s Shared Fantasy (EXCERPTS with NATV)

The discussion focused on the isolating and manipulative nature of narcissism, describing how narcissists create a detached, idealized reality that traps their victims, cutting them off from meaningful connections and reality checks. It was highlighted that narcissism is a global, pervasive phenomenon exacerbated by societal shifts such as technological isolation,

Read More »

Young Politician? BEWARE of This! (Political Academy)

The speaker addressed young aspiring politicians, warning them about the harsh realities of politics, emphasizing the importance of staying true to oneself despite temptations of corruption and power. He outlined the different types of politicians and political strategies, while stressing that youth is a liability in politics, with limited pathways

Read More »

How Technologies Profit from Your Loneliness, Encourage It

The discussion emphasized the critical role of healthy narcissism as a foundational element of mental health, distinguishing it from pathological narcissism and highlighting its genetic basis. It was proposed that mental health should be measured not only by ego-syntonic happiness and functionality but also by a third criterion: reality testing,

Read More »

Can YOU Be an Innovator? Not So Fast!

In this meeting, San Batin emphasized that innovation requires a unique combination of psychological traits, including humility, lifelong curiosity, open-mindedness, and the ability to form novel connections between concepts. Innovators are characterized by their deep respect for existing knowledge and their persistent wonder at the mysteries of reality, which drives

Read More »

Narcissist’s Words: Problematic, Assertoric – Not Apodictic

The speaker explored the philosophical distinctions in types of speech—assertoric, problematic, and apodictic—drawing on Aristotle and Kant to analyze how narcissists employ language. Narcissists predominantly use assertoric speech, making uncompromising, unverifiable claims to support their grandiose self-image, while often presenting apodictic speech that appears revolutionary but merely redefines established concepts.

Read More »