No Grandiosity Without Victimhood

Uploaded 3/18/2024, approx. 11 minute read

Summary

Pathological narcissism involves the combination of victimhood and grandiosity, which are cognitive distortions and reaction formations. The narcissist uses these to compensate for feelings of weakness and shame, creating a false narrative of perfection. Both victimhood and grandiosity involve emotionally invested misperceptions of reality, and they serve as a rejection of the narcissist's true self. These traits are specific to pathological narcissism and are not based on reality.

Tags

Victimhood and grandiosity are two facets of pathological narcissism.

They are pillars of this defense mechanism.

The compensatory aspect of pathological narcissism relies heavily on falsifying reality.

And there are two ways to falsify reality.

One of them is to say, “I’m godlike.

I’m a perfect being.” That is grandiosity.

It’s a cognitive distortion.

But similarly, another type of cognitive distortion is victimhood.

It’s to say, “I am not responsible for anything that’s happening to me.

I’m angelic.

I’m perfect.

I’m blameless.

I’m impeccable.

I’m immaculate.

Things are happening to me because I am supremely and infinitely good.”

As you see, both victimhood and grandiosity are two sides of the same coin.

And indeed, the narcissist succeeds to combine them in a way that is highly specific to pathological narcissism.

He says, “I am a victim because I’m godlike.” Now, how do you square this incredible circle?

The narcissist says, “I’m perfect.

I’m a genius.

I’m drop-dead gorgeous.

I’m hyper intelligent.

I’m super accomplished.

I am unprecedented.

I am incomparable.

And because of this, people envy me.

Because of this, they want to take me down.

It is my perfection that drives people to insanity.

They victimize me because I am a kind of divinity or deity.

It is the fact that I’m a genius, the fact that I’m irresistible, the fact that I’m amazing and fascinating and unique, the fact that I’m perfection, reified.

These facts drive people to the point of misbehaving.

These facts engender the misconduct of people.

That’s why they victimize me.

That’s why they trespass on my property.

That’s why they steal my work and my ideas.

That’s why they do these things to me.

I am a victim because I am perfect.

And this is the way the narcissist succeeds to combine grandiosity and victimhood.

But of course, the narcissist’s version of victimhood is grandiose.

The narcissist says, “I am chosen because I’m unique.

I am targeted because I am incomparably perfect.

I am made the butt of conspiracies and collusions because I am all-powerful and all-knowing, omnipotent and omniscient.

People want to take me down because they envy me.

They are mediocre.

They are pedestrian.

They are average.

And I’m not.

And they can’t tolerate this.

So the narcissist creates a plausible narrative where it is his nature, grandiose, inflated and fantastic as may be, it is his nature that drives people to victimize him.

He is discriminated against.

He is ignored.

He is rebuffed.

He is excommunicated.

He is appropriated.

He is abused.

He is maltreated.

He is mistreated.

And all this because people find his supremacy, his incontestable superiority intolerable.

They need to remove him from their lives because he keeps frustrating them with his perfection.

This is the combination.


Of course, this means that grandiosity, both grandiosity and victimhood are cognitive distortions.

They are ways to divorce reality.

Both grandiosity and victimhood falsify the truth.

Both of them impair what we call reality testing.

Both victimhood and grandiosity are narratives of perfection in an otherwise evil, imperfect world.

So these are grandiose narratives, exactly like paranoia.

Paranoia is also a grandiose narrative.

I’m the center of attention.

I’m at the focus of malign and malevolent planning and conspiring and so on.

So this is the paranoia is narrative, which is highly self-centered and highly inflated and highly fantastic.

The victim’s narrative is I’m chosen.

I’m special.

I’m unique because I’m super nice because amazingly empathic.

I’m an empath because I am, I don’t know what I am targeted for who I am.

So these are grandiose narratives.

But in addition to that, clinically speaking, both grandiosity and victimhood are what is called reaction formations.

Reaction formation to remind you is when you act in ways which defy who you truly are.

You cannot accept yourself as you are.

You reject yourself.

You’re ashamed of yourself.

Sometimes you feel guilty.

This is known collectively as ego destiny.

And so you compensate for this by pretending to not be you, by pretending to be someone else, by adopting a fake identity.

So for example, someone who is a latent homosexual would become homophobic.

He would reject homosexuals ostentatiously, thereby proving to the world that he is not homosexual.

Similarly, the narcissist is weak.

He is fragile.

He is vulnerable.

He’s broken.

He’s brittle.

The narcissistic personality organization is potentially the weakest, most enfeebled form of personality known in psychology.

It’s even much more fragile and much more vulnerable than the borderlines.

So the narcissist compensates for this innate, innate weakness, compensates for it by pretending to be super strong, by claiming that he is godlike, that he is perfect, that there’s nothing he cannot do. He can accomplish anything if he just puts his mind to it. By insisting that he is all-knowing and all-powerful. This is compensation for the truth. The truth is the narcissist is a bad object. The narcissist is a group of voices, a coalition of voices inside himself that keep informing him how weak he is, how stupid he is, how ugly, how inadequate, what a loser, how unlovable, and to compensate for this he pretends to be. Someone else.

Someone with properties and traits and qualities and characteristics which are the exact opposite of who the narcissist truly is.

And this is known as reaction formation.

Victimhood is also a reaction formation because the narcissist knows deep inside that he is being abusive, that he is abrasive, that he is sadistic, that he is cruel, in short, that he is truly a bad person.

And so to compensate for this, he pretends to be a victim.

It’s a form of reaction formation.

I’m not the abuser.

I’m a victim.

That’s victimhood.

I’m not weak.

I’m super strong.

That’s grandiosity.

Now, there’s a group of narcissists who do not possess a bad object.

They possess an idealized object.

They have voices inside themselves, introjects, that keep informing them that they are really godlike.

They are really perfect.

They are really omniscient.

They are really omnipotent, etc., etc.

They are really perfect.

This is the idealized object.

The idealized object tends to support grandiosity.

The idealized object drives the narcissist to believe that his grandiose fantastic claims about himself are actually true and that the false self is not false.

This is the idealized part.

And yet even this kind of narcissist resorts to victimhood because victimhood is morally superior.

The narcissist regards the world in terms of a morality play.

He is all perfect.

Everyone is imperfect.

He is all good.

Everyone is evil, etc., etc.

This is known as splitting.

It’s a primitive, infantile defense mechanism.

And in order to belong to the group of angels, he cast himself.

The narcissist cast himself as a victim because victims are all good.

Ironically, many victims of narcissists do exactly the same.

They split the world.

The narcissist is a demon, is diabolical, is demonic, is all evil.

And they, the victims of the narcissist, are perfect, angelic, impeccable.

They have no contribution and no responsibility to what has happened to them.

They are, in short, idealized victims.

So we see that grandiosity and victimhood are two sides of the same coin.

They involve cognitive distortions, in other words, misperceptions of reality, which are emotionally invested in.

There’s an emotional investment in falsifying reality.

This is not reframing, by the way.

Facing is when you see reality in a new light, which is true, an actual new light, a new light that conforms to the truth, to facts, and to reality.

That’s reframing.

This is not reframing.

This is falsifying reality, period.

Faking it.

So grandiosity and victimhood are cognitive distortions because they don’t correspond to reality at all. They’re not real. They’re narratives, fantastic narratives, nonsense.

Similarly, narcissism and grandiosity and victimhood are also reaction formations. They constitute a rejection of something inside the narcissist that the narcissist feels ill at ease with, that the narcissist rejects.

Most notably, his or her shame.

Nasty is a compensation for this shame, but so is victimhood.

In both cases, the narcissist is rendered perfect, impeccable, immaculate, and this is a good definition of pathological narcissism.

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Summary Link:

https://vakninsummaries.com/ (Full summaries of Sam Vaknin’s videos)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html (My work in psychology: Media Kit and Press Room)

Bonus Consultations with Sam Vaknin or Lidija Rangelovska (or both) http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/ctcounsel.html

http://www.youtube.com/samvaknin (Narcissists, Psychopaths, Abuse)

http://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings (World in Conflict and Transition)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com (Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/cv.html (Biography and Resume)

Summary

Pathological narcissism involves the combination of victimhood and grandiosity, which are cognitive distortions and reaction formations. The narcissist uses these to compensate for feelings of weakness and shame, creating a false narrative of perfection. Both victimhood and grandiosity involve emotionally invested misperceptions of reality, and they serve as a rejection of the narcissist's true self. These traits are specific to pathological narcissism and are not based on reality.

Tags

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Narcissism: Birth Order, Siblings (Literature Review)

The discussion explored the likelihood of siblings developing narcissistic personality disorder, emphasizing that birth order and being an only child have minimal impact on the development of pathological narcissism, which is likely influenced more by genetic predisposition and environmental factors. Studies indicate that both overt and covert narcissism can arise

Read More »

Sexualizing Anxiety and Anxiolytic Sex: Misattribution of Arousal

The concept of misattribution of arousal, where anxiety and sexual arousal are often confused or interchangeably misidentified, impacting emotional and physiological responses. It highlighted how anxiety can be mistaken for sexual attraction and vice versa, with both conditions influencing behavior and perception, including gender roles and narcissism. Various studies were

Read More »

Artificial Human Intelligence: Brain as Quantum Computer?

The speaker discussed their new project focused on developing a mathematical specification for an implantable PLL chip that would enable the brain to perceive the entire quantum wave function, including all collapsed and non-collapsed states, effectively transforming the brain into a powerful quantum computer. They argued that the brain is

Read More »

Narcissist’s Idealization in Grandiosity Bubble

Sam Vaknin explained the concept of grandiosity bubbles as defensive fantasy constructs narcissists create to maintain an inflated self-image and avoid confronting reality, especially during transitions between sources of narcissistic supply. These bubbles serve as temporary, protective isolations where the narcissist can recover from narcissistic injury without experiencing humiliation or

Read More »

Your Defensive Identification with the Aggressor (Abuser)

The psychological concept of “identifying with the aggressor,” where victims of abuse unconsciously adopt traits and behaviors of their abusers as a defense mechanism to cope with trauma and gain a sense of control. This process, rooted in childhood development and psychoanalytic theory, often leads to maladaptive coping, perpetuates the

Read More »

Back to Our Future: Neo-Feudalism is End of Enlightenment (Starts 01:27)

The speaker discussed the ongoing societal shift from Enlightenment ideals—science, liberal democracy, and bureaucracy—toward a resurgence of feudalism characterized by theocracy, oligarchy, and totalitarianism. This regression reflects widespread disillusionment with elitism and institutional failure, leading to a nihilistic period where the masses reject Enlightenment values in favor of authoritarian models

Read More »

Healthy Self-regulation vs. Dysregulation

Sam Vaknin explores the concept of self-regulation, emphasizing that it primarily concerns controlling behavior rather than internal processes, and highlights its significance in goal attainment and impulse control. He critiques the traditional notion of the “self” in self-regulation, noting the fluidity of identity and the social context’s role, and discusses

Read More »

When YOU Adopt Slave Mentality in Narcissist’s Shared Fantasy

The speaker explored the concept of slave mentality in victims of narcissistic abuse, explaining how narcissists enforce a shared fantasy that suppresses victims’ autonomy and identity. The speaker emphasized that victims often succumb to this mentality because it offers a deceptive sense of safety, predictability, and unconditional love akin to

Read More »

10 Signs: YOU are Broken, Damaged, Scarred

Sam Vaknin discusses the psychological patterns and clinical features common among damaged and broken individuals, emphasizing the impacts of trauma, mistrust, emotional detachment, and difficulties with intimacy and boundaries. He highlights defense mechanisms such as hypervigilance, emotional numbness, conflict avoidance, perfectionism, and the harsh inner critic, explaining how these behaviors

Read More »

Narcissism is So Hard to Believe! (with Yulia Kasprzhak, Clinician)

In-depth analysis of narcissistic personality disorder, emphasizing the distinction between narcissists, psychopaths, and borderlines, highlighting narcissists as delusional and psychotic with impaired reality testing and confabulation rather than manipulative liars. It discussed the complexities of narcissistic relationships, including “hoovering,” the dynamics of narcissistic abuse, and the detrimental impact on partners,

Read More »