Tip: click a paragraph to jump to the exact moment in the video. How Narcissist is Mortified (Empathy Aphantasia)
- 00:00 what can be done with narcissism certain behaviors can be modified
- 00:06 we call it behavior modification using certain treatment modalities we can modify behaviors
- 00:12 i recommend that you watch the video i’ve made about 12 ways 12 treatment modalities 12 therapies which are
- 00:19 applicable to narcissism and other personality disorders so we can modify behavior we can also
- 00:26 regulate moods if there is an attendant dual diagnosis or mood disorder
- 00:33 we can tackle the mood disorder usually with medication same goes for obsessive compulsive
- 00:39 features same goes for substance abuse and so on so anything that is attendant upon the
- 00:46 narcissism anything that comes with the narcissism can be treated in the usual manner but
- 00:52 narcissism pathological narcissism is there to stay untouchable immutable unchangeable and to death until
- 01:04 death as do part says the narcissist to his disorder
- 01:10 i hope i made this statement as loud and clear as it should be made because
- 01:17 there are a lot of very very irresponsible people online with and
- 01:23 without academic degrees people who have never heard of narcissism and suddenly became experts okay
- 01:31 the only case when the narcissist comes face to face with himself the only window of
- 01:37 opportunity for anything that resembles normalcy and some glimmerings of healing is mortification in the case of
- 01:49 modification and i’ve dealt with it in many other videos i’m not going to repeat it here if you
- 01:56 want to know what is modification please go and watch the previous videos i’ve made including most most recently
- 02:03 but generally speaking modification is when the grandiose search perception
- 02:09 of the narcissist crumbles and collapses because the narcissist
- 02:15 is challenged from the outside in a humiliating shaming manner so when the narcissist
- 02:23 grandiosity is undermined when someone or something exposes the narcissist
- 02:31 for what he really is when he can no longer maintain his defenses in the face of bruising
- 02:40 hurtful painful reality when his ideal self-perception is
- 02:46 inflated view of himself no longer can withstand the attack of countervailing information mockery derision humiliation insults
- 02:58 slides at that point there is decompensation all the narcissist defenses are deactivated and then the narcissist crumbles to dust
- 03:10 or breaks up like humpty dumpty falls from the wall from the very high
- 03:16 wall of his divinity self-imputed divinity
- 03:22 and now i have described modification in in many ways and today i would like to
- 03:28 add two weapons to the arsenal i would like to discuss mortification in its connection to aphantasia aphantasia and i would like to discuss
- 03:40 modifications as a form of misinformation effect fantasia misinformation effect um are two clinical constructs
- 03:53 and we’re going to discuss them now a fantasia um a
- 04:01 p h a n t a s i a a fantasia or a fantasia depending
- 04:07 on which country you are is congenital you’re born with it but in some cases you can acquire it a fantasia is the inability
- 04:21 to conjure up mental imagery in the mind’s eye when i tell you for
- 04:27 example chair somehow you see a chair or at least chair-ness the essence of a
- 04:34 chair in your mind usually you see actually a picture of a chair
- 04:40 if i tell you a woman it’s the same anything i tell you even non-objects conjures up images
- 04:47 this mental imagery is very important for processing cognitions cognitions and emotions and so some
- 04:55 people are born or develop an incapacity to access this library of mental images
- 05:03 they have no mind’s eye so to speak a fantastic people can think of an object can conceive of an object but can never imagine it it remains a word it remains
- 05:17 a concept it remains a symbol but never an image narcissus of course i like this they have people-centered fa phantasia
- 05:29 in other words they cannot evoke conjure up access
- 05:36 images of people they have empathy a fantasia
- 05:43 they can analyze people i do for a living they can understand other people i do
- 05:49 for a living but they can never visualize they can never visualize them as multi-dimensional fellow human beings
- 05:58 they have no mental imagery or not empathic imagery corresponding to the concept of a human
- 06:05 being while congenital aphantasia has to do with actual images in the narcissist the euphantasia is limited to empathy they don’t have an empathic resonance or an empathic response they cannot visualize other people in an
- 06:23 empathic way or using empathy what they have is only called empathy called empathy is
- 06:29 combination of reflexive and cognitive empathy you heard me cold empathy is not
- 06:35 cognitive empathy it’s not the same cognitive empathy is a component of cold empathy
- 06:41 there’s another component reflexive empathy but both of these cognitive and reflexive don’t have the
- 06:47 emotional component they miss the emotional component so the narcissist cannot create an
- 06:55 empathic map an empathic representation an empathic image of
- 07:02 other people he is a fantastic when it comes to other people he fails to construct a mentalist
- 07:10 or mentalization theory of mind a theory about how the how other minds operate narcissists are
- 07:17 not privy to the inter-subjective agreement inter-subjective agreement is the unspoken correspondence
- 07:25 between sentient human consciousnesses all healthy people have our
- 07:32 parties to adhere to collaborate in creating and maintaining the
- 07:38 inter-subjective agreement it’s the agreement that informs people on what it is to be
- 07:44 human what it is what it feels like what are the likely effects and cognitions
- 07:52 of a human being the intersubjective agreement is like a huge book of specifications coupled with the
- 07:58 user’s manual on how to be human and when we internalize this this huge
- 08:04 manual when we internalize the huge book this inter-subjective agreement we develop empathy because by
- 08:10 internalizing it and assimilating it and experiencing it we know what it means to be human we experience our humanness masters don’t have this they’re like
- 08:21 extra extraterrestrial observers who had crashed our planet dazed and been used
- 08:28 by the native variety of intelligence a fantasia or empathic a fantasia a new
- 08:35 coinage if you wish empathic advantage the inability to evoke empathic imagery is a core
- 08:45 core issue leading to mortification because of empathic effentesia the
- 08:51 narcissist is unable to decipher cues social cues sexual cues language cues lingual cues
- 09:00 even body language the narcissist is not human in this sense because he’s not human because he shares he has nothing in common with other human beings he’s not partying to this
- 09:11 agreement in the subjective agreement it’s like a hidden code some conspiracy so human
- 09:18 human beings baffle him and when because he cannot predict
- 09:27 he cannot understand he cannot foresee he cannot theorize on what to be human
- 09:35 is on the experience of being human he can also he is also often shocked
- 09:42 and surprised by other people’s behavior and reactions it is this shock
- 09:50 that triggers modification in extreme cases the narcissist develops unrealistic
- 09:58 not reality grounded expectations he develops he misreads
- 10:05 other people’s intentions motivations emotions moods cognitions he is lost
- 10:13 he’s baffled he’s puzzled he’s perplexed and then suddenly something happens
- 10:19 suddenly someone behaves in ways which affect the narcissist and it’s totally totally out of the blue totally discombobulating and shocking
- 10:30 and the narcissist falls apart he was not ready he had his army
- 10:36 somewhere else like the germans in on v-day on a d-day you know so the narcissist can engage in a social
- 10:47 interaction and suddenly someone humiliates him or shames him or insults him or criticizes him heavily or uh cheats on him
- 10:59 ostentatiously or betrays him horribly or and then the narcissist falls apart
- 11:05 it is this process of falling disintegrating slow motion disintegrating which is
- 11:11 which we call modification as his defenses shut down one after the other like a nuclear
- 11:17 reactor in trouble one one defense after another shuts down compartments are sealed his his his essence his
- 11:28 psyche is compartmentalized in a desperate attempt to contain the damage he closes he shuts down cell after cell compartment of the compartment drawer
- 11:39 after drawer category after category narrowing his world constricting his existence
- 11:47 to the point of vanishing he becomes a black hole at that point this black wholeness
- 11:53 is mortification when nothing else is left when all the defenses are gone and when suddenly nothing
- 12:03 nothing that he thought he knew makes sense anymore which leads me to the
- 12:09 misinformation effect now before we apply the misinformation effect
- 12:15 to modification misinformation effect is when someone’s recall
- 12:22 someone’s recollection of memories especially episodic memories
- 12:28 becomes less accurate or even totally wrong because of information after the event
- 12:35 let me explain you experience something you have an adventure you have sex
- 12:42 something happened you bought something you sold something an event and you have a memory of this event and
- 12:48 the memory includes your cognitions of the time your emotions at the time environmental data like smells and tastes i mean all these put together create a
- 12:59 scheme and create a kind of a coherent memory and this memory is deposited for later
- 13:07 for later retrieval when and if needed but misinformation effect is when in unrelated information or
- 13:19 related information later on changes the content of the original
- 13:25 memory so you went through something you created a memory then something else happened and then something else changed the original memory now this was
- 13:38 discovered by elizabeth loftus and it shocked shocked
- 13:44 the psychological community because everyone had assumed until about 1978
- 13:50 when loftus published her works everyone had assumed that memory was kind of a fixed thing
- 13:56 people were even saying that memories are proteins in the brain they’re like pathways filled with proteins they try
- 14:04 to find equivalence physical physiological equivalence to memory they were discussing memory storage like you would be shocked if the memory
- 14:15 your hard disk or your usb for your flash drive would suddenly
- 14:21 contain files that you’ve never put there or the contents of files there would have would change it would be shocking
- 14:27 wouldn’t it so there was this metaphor of human memory as a hard disk or hard drive
- 14:34 or flash drive you know but of course it’s it’s loftus discovered that it’s utterly wrong there’s no such thing
- 14:40 as a fixed memory everything is flowing everything is fluid there was a study in
- 14:47 in 1994 where students were shown a series of slides and there were objects in these slides and then they were they were shown other slides and then
- 14:59 they were read they were subjected to narratives they were subjected to speech
- 15:05 which misinformed them about the object that they had actually seen with their own eyes in the
- 15:11 slides later in the third stage of the trial they adhered to the narrative in other words if they saw for example a screwdriver
- 15:22 and then they were told later you did not see a screwdriver they saw a screwdriver and someone told
- 15:28 them for example the professor you did not see a screwdriver at a later stage when they were asked
- 15:34 did you see a screwdriver they were denied they said no we did not see it so post event information the professor’s injunction you did not see a screwdriver affected the actual memory of having seen a screwdriver
- 15:50 that’s how bad it is in other experiments loftus and others had created
- 15:57 out of thin air out of whole cloth
- 16:04 events childhood events that had never happened so they had convinced people a big
- 16:11 number of people like about 35 40 of the participants they had convinced them
- 16:18 that they had experienced an event in childhood that actually had never happened
- 16:25 was totally invented a lie and yet these people had recalled the
- 16:32 event described the event and defended the veracity of the event so yeah of course i i went through this of course it happened to me you’re wrong because they were told after that listen
- 16:42 it’s all invented it’s all it never happened and this is not true it did happen i remember it clearly
- 16:49 every detail so you see that the misinformation
- 16:56 effect is is what we call retroactive interference retroactive interference there’s new information new event new circumstances new something that goes back boomerangs catapults back and changes
- 17:14 memories that preceded the information or the event so later information
- 17:22 interferes with the ability to retain previously encoded information the new
- 17:28 information works backwards and distort memories of original events and the misinformation
- 17:35 effect had been studied at length i mentioned elizabeth loftus but there were numerous others anything in there were
- 17:42 studies about the connection between misinformation event and suggestibility suggestibility is your tendency
- 17:49 to to react to the influence of other people’s expectations by changing your memory
- 17:56 or by changing your beliefs or by changing your knowledge your cognitions so some people
- 18:04 are essentially kind of people pleasers and they would go they would go the whole nine yards they would change what they remember they would change what they think they would change what they feel
- 18:14 they would change their moods everything and this is suggestibility it’s reaction to other people’s
- 18:20 influence which is heightened and unusual there’s also misattribution information attributed to it to an incorrect source in correct place incorrect date inquiry
- 18:31 correct set of circumstances preceding circumstances so there’s a lot of research on the misinformation effect and it cost great this research cast huge doubt
- 18:43 on the permanence and reliability of memory before i continue with the work of loftus miller burns and many others i
- 18:54 want to tie it in to the narcissist the misinformation effect is a huge
- 19:00 problem for the narcissist much bigger than for normal people and you have seen
- 19:06 that even normal people react to the misinformation effect by falsifying their memories
- 19:13 simply falsifying their memories big time big percentage of the people falsify big time
- 19:20 with the narcissist it’s even bigger because the narcissist you remember is dissociative the narcissist has
- 19:27 severe problems with his memory in other words the narcissist doesn’t remember what he remembers
- 19:34 he is never sure he’s never certain what had really happened and what was only his fantasy or his
- 19:40 imagination everything is mixed it’s a god awful chaos in his mind and he needs all the time to
- 19:48 breach the memory gaps the missing time he so he he creates narratives and
- 19:55 stories which are essentially fictitious the works of fiction they’re confabulated and the idea is to
- 20:02 kind of present a plausible normal probable facade to the world yeah my memory is intact here i remember but these are not memories these are inventions so the narcissist
- 20:15 has islands of memory islands of memory bridged bridged with confabulations and outright lies sometimes very rare but our definitely fantasies so when the narcissist is confronted
- 20:31 when the narcissist is confronted with an event or a person or a speech act
- 20:37 statement that challenge his memory he is much more likely to believe the outside source then his
- 20:49 own memory he is much more likely to go outside for veracity
- 20:56 and truth in fact than inside the narcissist knows that he cannot
- 21:02 trust his mind that their memory there’s this abyss where memory should have been
- 21:08 the memory gaps there’s lost lost lost time dissociation amnesia
- 21:15 he knows it’s a mess it’s a mess over there in his mind he knows his mind is a mess
- 21:21 so what he does instead he relies on other people to provide him with reality testing
- 21:28 with facts with with analysis with judgments and opinions and this is
- 21:35 of course the process of narcissistic supply now he filters all this information via
- 21:42 his grandiosity but it’s topic for another video another lecture what is important to understand that the
- 21:48 narcissist is an external locus of control also in the sense that he
- 21:55 positions himself in the world he gauges his coordinates he gains
- 22:02 reality feeling for reality from other people it doesn’t come from inside
- 22:09 there’s nothing inside just an empty schizoid core fumbling in the dark trying to recall what the hell has happened yesterday or two years ago what did they
- 22:21 do wrong what did they say what didn’t i mean total thought the nazis in a state of
- 22:27 total confusion all the time and so he needs other people to calibrate him
- 22:33 to channel him to contain him to provide him with truth and fact and opinions he can
- 22:42 trust and when these external inputs
- 22:48 are humiliating shameful hurtful challenging undermining
- 22:57 the narcissist tends to adopt the emotional content of
- 23:03 the input because the narcissist cannot trust himself he doesn’t have a benchmark he doesn’t
- 23:09 have a standard he doesn’t have a yardstick he cannot he cannot vet
- 23:16 or analyze the input that he is getting from the outside he cannot say well she thinks i’m stupid but i know i’m not stupid he cannot say this because the second part of his sentence i know i’m not stupid doesn’t
- 23:32 exist there’s nothing there so if someone says he’s stupid
- 23:39 he is forced to adopt her point of view
- 23:45 any input that he gets positive or negative impacts the narcissist extremely
- 23:52 disproportionately catastrophic catastrophically i would say precisely because there’s no counterbalance inside
- 23:59 his mind the narcissist doesn’t balance his self-knowledge and self-awareness
- 24:06 and memories and identity against input from the outside because he has none of these he has no identity at least not core identity he has no memories only dissociative
- 24:19 states and self-states he has nothing to fight back any negative input there’s no balance there so anything in everything disbalances
- 24:31 him and balances him and he falls off the wall by completed and he breaks up mortification so the narcissist is
- 24:39 actually extremely suggestible extremely suggestible and he he has problems with attribution
- 24:47 input from the outside he feels that input from the outside is actually coming from the inside
- 24:54 why because the narcissist is not interacting within external objects he’s interacting with internal objects remember snapshotting he internalizes external
- 25:07 objects and he continues to interact only with the internal objects never with the external objects so when there is input from an external object
- 25:18 it it is perceived misperceived by the narcissist as coming from inside
- 25:24 and that could be utterly shocking if if the narcissist comes across
- 25:30 someone who hates him derides him decries him shames him
- 25:36 humiliates him in public cheats on him betrays him someone who destroys his
- 25:43 grandiosity not only not only
- 25:49 there’s a problem in countering this hateful input you know the narcissist doesn’t
- 25:56 have any weapons against this kind of of negating vitiating vicious malevolent input
- 26:04 he has no tools against it because he has no memory he has no identity he has nothing he’s not there there’s nobody there so he cannot fight it not only that but he feels that it’s
- 26:15 coming from inside now don’t forget many of the narcissist introjects the internal objects in his
- 26:23 head the voices of mother the voices of the voice of father the voices of teachers peers society many of these internal
- 26:30 objects are sadistic they’re malevolent they’re vicious the narcissist’s parents
- 26:38 conditioned their love on performance or they told him that he’s bad and
- 26:44 unworthy when he had failed or they tortured and abused him in more classical ways
- 26:50 so the internal objects in his head all the time generate negating input humiliating input all the time put him down all the time
- 27:02 criticizing sadistically cruelly pushing him in effect to commit suicide
- 27:08 which he never does he’s not a borderline but still so he has many enemies inside
- 27:14 and when someone from the outside says something bad humiliates him
- 27:21 disgraces him puts him down sadistically tramples on him this
- 27:27 outsider is working hand in hand with the same input from the internal objects
- 27:35 so if someone tells the narcissist you’re ugly there is an internal object in the narcissist’s head’s
- 27:41 head that is saying the same and there’s a resonance the narcissist
- 27:47 anyhow has an internal object that keeps telling him you’re ugly and then a woman comes and tells him
- 27:53 you’re ugly and this resonates powerfully with the already existing internal object so negative input
- 28:04 is multiplied and amplified in the echo chamber of internal objects that is the narcissist
- 28:11 mind and such amplification can reach a crescendo
- 28:17 which which results in motification a point where the vibrations of
- 28:24 negativity are such that they crack open destroy the metal or the metal of the narcissist mind and psyche that’s very important to understand the
- 28:36 misinformation effect in the case of the narcissist is doubly and triply and quantuply and i know
- 28:43 but exponential stronger much stronger it drives the narcissist
- 28:49 to distrust himself even more it enhances and mattresses and amplifies
- 28:55 and magnifies his own negative internal negativity as manifested and expressed by his own
- 29:03 internal objects it undermines his grandiosity self-perception and self-image his fantasy of himself it devalues him countering his co-idealization it
- 29:15 reduces him to smithereens it’s utterly destructive like a nuclear bomb exploding within the
- 29:22 empty schizoid core and the narcissist all over the place in shattered in shards and can can he be put together
- 29:35 like humpty dumpty um mortification is the closest that the narcissist gets
- 29:42 to his true self it’s a glimpse of what he is without all the defenses
- 29:50 that he had constructed over the many years without his grandiosity without his omnipotence
- 29:56 without his omniscience without anything he’s suddenly reduced by mortification
- 30:02 back regresses to a childhood state when he was a helpless tormented wounded
- 30:10 injured abused traumatized child weeping in the corner bleeding sometimes
- 30:18 so the misinformation effect colludes in creating the modification because for
- 30:25 example let’s take the example of um someone telling the narcissist
- 30:32 you are ugly and unattractive and no no one will have sex with you you’re
- 30:39 repulsive okay so the first thing that happens
- 30:45 is this external external input is immediately perceived as valid valid
- 30:52 because there’s no balance inside the narcissist there are no structures inside the narcissist that would oppose
- 30:59 this assessment that would say i’m not ugly i am attractive even his rationality is disabled where
- 31:07 he could have told himself wait a minute but i’ve had many women i mean that’s not true it’s factually untrue no
- 31:13 the external input is immediately validated as 100 000 true and that’s it now
- 31:21 this external input colludes collaborates with similar input from in other
- 31:28 internal objects because analysis may have been told by his mother the very same thing you’re ugly you’re unlovable you’re
- 31:34 unattractive no one will ever want to be with you and so the introject of the mother is saying the same things from inside that the external object the external source is same from the
- 31:46 outside and there’s a confluence there’s a combination the two inputs congeal and become one much bigger much harder to resist if at all so at that point
- 32:02 at that point the narcissist had internalized the negative input and had attributed it
- 32:09 attributed it to an internal object he had already snapshotted the external source and now he takes
- 32:17 this input and puts it amalgamates it with the internal representation of the external source and now he has two voices that keep telling him you’re unattractive you’re not lovable you’re
- 32:29 you’re not sexy you’re disgusting you’re repulsive no woman want to be with you et cetera et cetera et cetera that two voices are
- 32:35 saying this given a multiplicity of such voices it can become
- 32:41 a fixture in other words what we call in cognitive behavioral therapy it can become a negative automatic
- 32:48 thought a kind of sentence that defines the analysis of self-awareness
- 32:54 and cognition and dictates behaviors and moods so this is the first process now having having internal having created an
- 33:06 internal object for the external source having taken the input of the the negative input of the external source
- 33:13 and amalgamated it with internal object at that point the narcissist has to
- 33:19 reassess re-evaluate revisit revise
- 33:25 and reframe all his history because it’s kind of a new input
- 33:31 admittedly his mother told him this but his mother is his mother here’s a woman telling him the same
- 33:37 a woman he’s interested in when he wants telling him the very same so that’s new information and he has to
- 33:44 rewrite all his memories such as they are and they’re not many
- 33:50 but he has to rewrite them in view of this new information which remember he considers 100 correct so here’s new
- 33:58 information you’re ugly you’re unattractive you are not sexy no woman would ever want to sleep with you
- 34:04 or to be with you and he has to take this information and now what he does he goes back in time and he revisits all the previous occasions that he had interacted with the woman let’s say
- 34:16 over all previous occasions that women looked at him paid some attention to or whatever and
- 34:22 then he rewrites these memories he revises them he revises them to conform to the new negative information so even if he had slept with a woman he would
- 34:35 try to find moments in the encounter where she might have looked repelled or
- 34:42 she might have been disgusted or she might have found him unattractive or she might have criticized his sexual performance
- 34:49 or the fact that she left immediately thereafter didn’t want to be in touch with him anymore etc so he is kind of gathering
- 34:56 incriminating material he is revisiting each event each encounter
- 35:02 each circumstance each moment in time and rewriting it in a way
- 35:09 that will conform to the new negative input by isolating incriminating material
- 35:17 and amplifying it so if you tried in the past to court a
- 35:24 woman and she said no let’s add fuel to the conflagration
- 35:30 confirms the new negative input if he if she said yes but you know it was
- 35:36 just a date and nothing happened that proves that he’s not sexy and not attractive if they did go to bed he did
- 35:42 not perform she was disgusted she left she criticized him he would he will all he will utterly
- 35:48 revamp his view of himself because he the two up until the moment that he
- 35:56 had received the negative input he thought of himself as irresistible as sexy
- 36:02 as attractive as handsome is amazing this new input forces him to
- 36:09 dismantle his grandiosity and rewrite his history create
- 36:16 effectively new fake memories he creates fake memories to conform to
- 36:23 and support the new negative information about his attractiveness or lack of
- 36:29 attractiveness and what happens to the previous grandiose defense i’m irresistible i’m handsome and so on
- 36:35 it’s gone it’s dead so if a sufficient number
- 36:42 if there is a critical threshold of negative inputs
- 36:48 all the memories are revised and all the grandiosity defenses are dismantled and is left naked skinless
- 36:57 in direct touch with reality abrasive and bruising as it is and this is
- 37:04 motivation now back to misinformation effect [Music] i said that misinformation effect has been studied for at least
- 37:15 four or five five decades and they discovered that certain things precondition people to
- 37:23 to the misinformation effect in other words some people react very strongly to the misinformation effect so when they receive new information they revise previous memories they fake them they dismantle them and reassemble them
- 37:35 in wrong ways they deny their own memory and so on and this is what the
- 37:41 narcissist does so they discovered certain behaviors and certain traits that predispose people to do this
- 37:48 susceptibility not everyone reacts the same to the misinformation effects
- 37:54 some traits and some qualities increase or decrease one’s susceptibility to recalling
- 38:01 misinformation and so age for example working memory capacity personality traits and the ability to to conjure and deal with imagery you remember how
- 38:13 we started this lecture when we were both much younger a fantasia inability to process imagery so imagery or inability to process imagery is
- 38:24 intimately connected to the misinformation effect which leads essentially to modification narcissists cannot
- 38:30 process imagery empathic imagery he has no imagery of people
- 38:36 the myers-briggs type indicator is a kind of test that assesses
- 38:42 personalities i personally i i personally like it a lot it’s frowned upon in academia if you
- 38:48 talk to stodgy professors they will tell you no it’s this is i disagree completely thing is one of the hugest it is one of the hugest databases of personality tests in the world
- 39:01 and it was among the first to suggest a dimensional approach so it was much ahead of its time i am
- 39:07 all for the mbti myers-briggs type indicator so
- 39:13 um when mars when the mbti was applied to people who were exposed to the mis information effect they discovered that introvert intuitive participants
- 39:25 were more likely to accept both accurate and inaccurate post-event information extrovert
- 39:33 sensate participants were much less likely to accept both accurate
- 39:40 and inaccurate post-event information introverts are more likely to have lower
- 39:46 confidence in their memory more likely to accept misinformation in this sense never mind how gregarious
- 39:55 how sociable how outgoing how how life of the party the narcissist is the narcissist is an introvert that’s not some vaccine that’s carl jung
- 40:06 carlion was the first to link introversion with narcissism i recommend that you watch the video i’ve made about jung’s perception of narcissism narcissists are introverse they’re
- 40:17 introverted because they are schizoid and schizoids by definition are introverted
- 40:23 schizoids are not sociable they don’t they don’t like people they don’t want people people give them no pleasure they don’t want even sex and all narcissists have a schizoid core
- 40:34 and they’re introverted they go out of their way to socialize and and so on because they need constant
- 40:41 narcissistic supply it’s a compassion but at the core they’re introverted and yes
- 40:47 they they do not trust they do not have confidence in their memory and they are more likely to accept
- 40:53 misinformation individual personality characteristics including empathy
- 41:00 absorption self-monitoring have also been linked to greater susceptibility and here
- 41:08 both heightened empathy and no empathy actually lead to the same
- 41:15 results if you had watched my previous videos i cited many studies several studies that had demonstrated that they have if you have very high empathy
- 41:26 you misjudge people badly the higher your empathy the less well you read people the less
- 41:34 well you understand people it’s counter-intuitive and i explain it in these videos these are the recent studies i’m sorry
- 41:41 um to um i’m sorry to rain on your parade but these are the recent studies so
- 41:48 heightened empathy and no empathy are the same in both conditions you cannot read proper people properly
- 41:54 self-absorption is of course narcissistic self-monitoring is definitely narcissistic masters is self-monitors all the time positions himself sculpts himself he is an actor he’s like
- 42:06 in a theater play maximum self-monitoring that’s the irony analysis are actually hyper hyper when it comes to self-awareness they have too much self-awareness which
- 42:17 in itself is a fascinating topic one could describe narcissism very well and derive it
- 42:23 from excess or pathological self-awareness but again it’s a topic for another lecture at any rate these traits disturbances in empathy fluctuations in equity dysregulated empathy no empathy uh self-absorption and
- 42:39 self-monitoring we’re linked in studies to the misinformation effect there’s also evidence that the misinformation effect
- 42:51 is much bigger in social groups when people are together
- 42:57 probably because they influence each other’s memories and probably because of peer pressure of of some kind there is a phenomenon which is like a hive mind
- 43:09 memories blend misinformation diffuses it seems that when we’re in a group or
- 43:15 when we’re when another person for example in intimate setting we derive part of our memories or we reframe and
- 43:22 reshape our memories according to input from the other person which is pretty amazing because it means
- 43:29 that our minds melt become one when it comes to memory and we process memory together when you’re with an intimate partner on a date you process memories together
- 43:41 human that’s why i’m dead set against the concept of individual i don’t think there’s such a thing what we call individual is a node a node in a network is a bid
- 43:53 in indra’s net it’s it’s interconnected to define a person
- 44:00 you need a relational approach even something highly intimate highly special
- 44:06 highly idiosyncratic highly personal like memory is manipulated influenced
- 44:13 by other people in the room you shape your memories according to input
- 44:19 from these people and they shape theirs simultaneously the same way
- 44:27 so the misinformation effect operates in a very interesting way which
- 44:34 ties it intimately to modification first of all when you have experienced an event or
- 44:41 something you store it you don’t rehearse it you don’t actively rehash it and go
- 44:47 through it if you do it’s a problem it’s called rumination and it’s considered a pathology it’s a problem the longer the delay between the presentation of the original event and the post-event information the more likely it is that individuals will incorporate the
- 45:04 misinformation into the new memory the longer so this is the analysis problem there’s
- 45:11 usually a huge delay between the
- 45:17 countervailing negative humiliating shaming information and the array origin original memories
- 45:25 that he’s revising so he has memories from childhood for example and then 40 years later someone tells
- 45:31 him something which is very humiliating and disturbing and so on and because it’s such an enormous delay
- 45:38 the misinformation effect is almost total the longer i repeat the longer the gap
- 45:44 in time between the original memory and the misinformation provided later the longer the gap the more the original memory is revised
- 45:58 more time to study the original event if you dedicate more time to study the original event leads to lower susceptibility to the misinformation effect because of increased rehearsal time
- 46:11 loftus coined the phrase called discrepancy detection principle she said that a person’s recollections
- 46:18 are more likely to change if they do not immediately detect the discrepancies between misinformation and the original event
- 46:26 sometimes people recognize some discrepancy between the memory and what they’re being told but uh
- 46:33 not always this doesn’t always have effect and if the discrepancy is spotted much later people tend to doubt their memory people might recollect i
- 46:44 thought i saw something i saw i saw this and this uh but the new information
- 46:50 mentions another thing so i guess i must have been wrong it was that other thing people generally
- 46:56 don’t trust their memories um people in in many cases
- 47:03 in about half the cases actually people would adopt uh later information which contradicts
- 47:10 their memories they would adopt the later information and drop their memories now imagine the narcissist who has no
- 47:18 intact memory has notice has no continuity in memory imagine how frightened he is how
- 47:24 terrified he is that his memories may be completely wrong the dissociation renders the
- 47:30 narcissist totally doubtful he doubts his own memory he can’t trust
- 47:37 himself at all and and so whenever there are
- 47:43 discrepancies the narcissist would adopt the new information is real and would attribute what we call source reliability social reliability in other words
- 47:54 as healthy people they grade they great sources of information according to reliability they say
- 48:01 well the mainstream media is not reliable fox news is reliable or something so people grade sources of
- 48:09 information the narcissist is a problem with source reliability the narcissist grades everyone on the
- 48:16 same same level of reliability there there are differences in the
- 48:22 quality of narcissistic supply that’s true but not in the reliability and we should not confuse the two issues when the narcissist receives input from the outside
- 48:34 he analyzes two things reliability and quality so as far as reliability
- 48:40 everyone is the same everyone is the same the chambermaid and the hotel manager the same they are
- 48:47 both reliable 100 percent reliable why because the master system is zero percent reliable
- 48:53 because the narcissist considers himself as totally unreliable he trusts everyone is totally reliable
- 49:00 however the quality of course is different information coming from the chambermaid would be weight weighted differently to information coming from the hotel manager dord and bradshaw in 1980
- 49:13 they conducted an experiment and they demonstrated that this misinformation was rejected by those who received information from the unreliable source and adopted by those who received information from reliable sources but that’s not a defense in the case of
- 49:29 the narcissist because as far as cause is concerned everyone is equally reliable
- 49:37 so what the narcissist does the minute is exposed to mortifying mortifying information or
- 49:43 potentially modifying information he begins to conduct a furious debate a free furious conversation within
- 49:51 himself with inside his mind and all the internal objects participate and all the fragments of memory are thrown into the cauldron you know like the four witches of macbeth and it’s a bloody mess
- 50:04 immediately after exposure to such triggers what goes on in the narcissist mind can
- 50:10 be described as some kind of cataclysmic earthquake tsunami and volcano eruption
- 50:17 at once and there’s a conversation going on and and the conversation is actually not helpful because the core
- 50:28 of the conversation is this i’ve just received information that challenges everything i knew about
- 50:34 myself but because i’m an unreliable source and the information came from a reliable
- 50:40 source i am bound to trust this information and not to trust myself i cannot trust myself
- 50:49 my view of myself is fantastic is wrong i must revise it urgently someone just
- 50:56 told me that i’m completely wrong about myself someone forced me to look in the mirror and what i saw in the mirror was had nothing to do with what i had thought about myself until until
- 51:09 right now until recently so this conversation actually is detrimental
- 51:16 to the integrity of the narcissist’s remaining memory he challenges
- 51:22 everything his self-perception his self-image his ideal image his grandiosity his defenses his his his memories of his childhood his everything simply everything
- 51:35 it’s like remembrance of things past garbled in a shredder it’s a it’s a huge
- 51:41 mess and and this discussion this inner discussion results in a rewriting of the narcissist’s personal history
- 51:52 and self-perception in ways that mortify him he is reduced
- 51:59 he goes back to childhood because he cannot trust any memory from childhood onwards so he finds himself suddenly a child again but without all the defenses that he had
- 52:10 developed and abused and traumatized as he had been when he was a child
- 52:21 this is the misinformation effect now there are many many factors that
- 52:28 affect the misinformation effect and have nothing to do with narcissism for example for example substance abuse alcoholism
- 52:36 hypnosis all these increase the misinformation effect
- 52:43 i refer you to studies by acefi and gary about 20 years ago leading questions
- 52:51 narrative accounts falsify memory arousal immediately after learning um
- 53:00 if you’re aroused immediately after you learn something there is less um source confusion memories that are
- 53:08 created after arousal are more difficult to falsify more difficult to tamper with they’re temper proof because of the arousal it’s like in printing it’s like everyone remembers where they were
- 53:20 on 9 11 or when jfk was assassinated because there was arousal which was connected to the memory still by the way studies have shown that a year later half of the people
- 53:33 misremembered remembered wrongly where they were at the moment that the towers collapsed
- 53:40 on 9 11 half remembered wrongly when i say wrongly i mean totally wrongly every detail was wrong memory is extremely unreliable
- 53:53 anticipation of misinformation can reduce the efficacy of misinformation but the analysis here is a hostage he doesn’t anticipate misinformation
- 54:04 he gives reliability veracity and credibility to every bit of information they’re all of equal of equal measure sleep psychotropic medication etc etc
- 54:17 so the misinformation effect is amenable and sensitive to many
- 54:25 other influences but this kind of misinformation effect doesn’t interest us because it has to do with other
- 54:31 population groups other cohorts we’re interested of course in in narcissism um one of the problems that we deal with in
- 54:43 the misinformation effect is very complexity of human memory it’s the influence of information
- 54:52 whether the information is legitimate or falsified and now we are faced with the problem of fake news for example yes conspiracy theories the intro of information
- 55:04 uh generally would support false information now this
- 55:10 is something that we kind of sweep under the carpet because uh it’s a bit politically incorrect to say that most people are not the brightest stars in the galaxy they have base rate fallacy they trust 95
- 55:26 what they hear without confirming or checking and one of the problems is uh
- 55:33 again information fake information falsified information
- 55:39 is very powerful especially if the messages are confirmed uh and validated in a variety of ways from various sources never mind that all
- 55:51 these sources are allied that might all collaborate but if you get if you get exposed to the same message
- 55:58 several times it becomes much more difficult to to fight the false information so modification in narcissism occurs
- 56:05 after multiple explosion exposures multiple exposures to the same person
- 56:11 who had assaulted the narcissist in various ways or multiple explosions to multiple
- 56:17 people or in multiple circumstances but at some point there’s a critical mass like a nuclear bomb it’s a critical mass and when the critical masses
- 56:28 is reached then the mortification takes place
- 56:36 and it’s very difficult to reverse misinformation and it’s very difficult to reverse mortification although the narcissist defenses are
- 56:48 gradually rebuilt gradually his masses simply cannot survive exposed to reality as it is he doesn’t have the tools he doesn’t have a self self is an organizing principle he doesn’t have reality test he cannot make sense of the world he cannot make
- 57:03 sense of other people because he lacks sympathy so he has no he’s not privy to the human
- 57:09 condition and he suffers grievously from the misinformation effect and he’s sufficiently confident in the
- 57:20 misinformation so that he restructures rewrites rephrases his memories and even acts on
- 57:28 the on the misinformation so ironically it’s his grandiosity and his narcissism
- 57:35 um that push him to stick to his guns and you know refuse any contrary input
- 57:42 after that the misinformation sets in poisons his system alters his memories and then this
- 57:49 becomes the new status quo the new consensus among the internal objects in his mind
- 57:55 and he’s emotionally invested in it he has sunk costs he has invested so much in it now to
- 58:02 revise everything no way plus he can never be wrong he’s never wrong he’s infallible he never makes mistakes so now that he had rewritten everything
- 58:13 that’s the new gospel it’s a new truth it’s a new bible that’s why it’s very difficult when you when the narcissist had devalued you initially it’s very difficult to change his mind because he’s invested in the
- 58:25 new in the new status quo he’s invested in the new newfound
- 58:31 knowledge or actually wrong knowledge but doesn’t matter so there’s a problem because
- 58:38 narcissism feeds the narcissist investment in wrong data
- 58:45 in misinformation and it works against him because the misinformation coming
- 58:51 from outside in the case of mortification is self-negating he’s humiliating his shaming
- 58:57 but his narcissism won’t allow the narcissist to cast this information aside his
- 59:03 narcissism is grandiosity informed analysis tell the narcissist
- 59:09 your processing of the negative information was right you’re always right you’re never wrong
- 59:16 even when you had adopted a shaming humiliating inferior view of yourself
- 59:24 you are still superior in your ability to get it right so you got it right you are inferior you
- 59:31 got it right you’re shameful you got it right you’re an idiot you got it right you are disgusting you got it right you
- 59:37 are repulsive you got it right you got it right you got it right you’re evil you got it right
- 59:43 and this is called external modification in order to revive his defenses to resuscitate them
- 59:49 reactivate them and reboot the whole narcissistic process the narcissist transitions from external
- 59:55 modification to internal modification and i describe this process in in previous
- 60:03 in previous videos the problem with narcissism and with the narcissist is that his
- 60:09 false information is what we call rich false memories rich false memories is when entire segments of personal biography and personal history are false
- 60:21 are written from scratch our inventions are fiction never happened the
- 60:28 narcissist reacts to misinformation by creating rich false memories not regular false memories but rich false memories
- 60:35 because he has a victim stance and he has a view of himself which is grandiose he’s very limited he’s very rigid in his
- 60:43 ability to rewrite or reframe his memories so he must adhere to very strict rules on how to
- 60:50 rewrite his memories and these rules mean that sometimes very often actually
- 60:56 he has to invent totally invent confabulate i don’t know what word to
- 61:03 use simply conjure up out of thin air whole segments of biography and and personal history and this is where the narcissistic presence resistance
- 61:14 kicks in this is where the problem is is once he had invented these
- 61:20 segments of an unlived life he experiences them as memories
- 61:26 and so he will fight tooth and nail to defend the veracity of these memory
- 61:32 fake memories so first he creates a fake memory about something that had never happened
- 61:38 and then he experienced it as a real memory and then he defends it as a real memory
- 61:45 he’s gonna become very aggressive if you dare to tell him listen uh honey this never happened you know it’s all in
- 61:52 your hand it’s never happened it’s gonna attack you it’s gonna project it’s gonna become aggressive
- 61:58 and this is why multiplication is very transient and the only way to reverse modification
- 62:05 is to ignore all the question of memory and actually to assimilate the guilt and
- 62:12 the shame and the humiliation is integral components of the personality
- 62:18 in other words the narcissist’s only way to cope with the modification is not to preserve the integrity of
- 62:26 his original memories is not to reverse the falsification of memories he is incapable of both these things
- 62:34 his only way to find the motivation is to adopt it to assimilate it to say yes i am
- 62:42 i am evil and ugly and shameful and stupid and i don’t know what but having said that i am the one who makes everything happen
- 62:53 it’s my because i’m evil these people humiliated me and shamed me because i
- 62:59 made them humiliate me and shame me my girlfriend cheated on me because i
- 63:06 abused her i made her cheat on me so it restores the narcissist’s grandiosity
- 63:12 when the narcissist says i’m evil i’m corrupt i’m a misfit he’s proud of it
- 63:18 because his his viciousness his evilness his abuse his
- 63:26 misconduct makes the world go around everyone is reactive to him he’s in control of everything so bad things that people do to him bad
- 63:38 things that people say to him he made them do it he made them do these things he made them say
- 63:44 these things he controls their they’re his puppets they’re his pawns he he convinces himself that he had what
- 63:51 he wanted them to do this thing and he wanted them to say these things to him and that’s the extent of the narcissistic insanity there’s never winning with the gnosis he
- 64:04 will always find a way for a stratagem to put himself at the center the controller the mover the shaker the prima causer and
- 64:17 god in effect