Tips: Narcissist Weaponizes Your Children Against You (Pop the Red Pill Podcast)

Uploaded 1/13/2022, approx. 33 minute read

Summary

Dr. Sam Vaknin discusses narcissistic abuse and how it differs from other forms of abuse. He explains how narcissists use children as pawns to control and hurt their ex-spouses, and outlines the five techniques they use to alienate children. Vaknin emphasizes the importance of telling children the truth about the alienating parent's harmful behaviors. Narcissistic personality disorder parents should be denied custody and granted supervised visitation only, as they are dangerous and generate sick dynamics with the child.

And so this dynamic is very pernicious, because the narcissistic parent is signaling to the child, by becoming separate from me, by becoming your own person, by becoming an individual, you’re hurting me. It’s painful to me what you’re doing.

So please stop growing. Don’t grow anymore. Just stop here and remain my little child who is fawning and adulating and always loves me, and has nothing bad to say about me, and always agrees with me, and always adulates me, because that’s the way I want you for the rest of your life. I don’t want you to become your own person, because it hurts. That’s a very, very toxic and poisonous message.

And many children do exactly this. They do just this. They stop growing. They stop growing to gratify the narcissistic parent.

This is especially true for when we come to parentifying children, children who had become parents of their own parents.

So some children parentify the narcissistic parent, as I said, they become protective of the narcissistic parent. They become like the mothers of the narcissistic parent.

And so these children definitely cannot walk away because they feel they are abandoning a child.

So there’s an inverse dynamic. The narcissistic parent becomes the child, and the child, the offspring of the narcissistic parent becomes the parent and can’t walk away because you don’t abandon a child.

So these are very sick, pathological dynamics within the family system. And the narcissist leverages each and every one of them gleefully, willingly, knowingly. And if he’s psychopath, he does it cunningly and deliberately and intentionally with planning premeditated, premeditated way.

So and then the child is deformed, is deformed for life, is scarred, scarred for life. This kind of child grows up with a very dysfunctional attachment style.

When he teams up with an intimate partner, all he knows to do is parentify. So he tries to become the intimate partner’s parent or the intimate partner’s child. He doesn’t know better. He doesn’t know. He never became an adult in the full sense of the word. He’s a simulated parent or simulated child. He was never allowed to be a child as well. He’s an extension.

Now, the other parent is there watching all these dynamics.

But the problem is, for example, law enforcement, mental health practitioners, they don’t recognize these dynamics. You can’t go to a police station and say, I want to file a complaint against my husband. He’s parentifying my child. You can’t do that. You can’t even explain it to the vast, overwhelming majority of therapies. They don’t know what the hell is parentifying. They never heard of it. You can’t complain to a judge or to an evaluator or to court appointed psychologist. You can’t complain to them that the narcissist is subverting the child’s ability to associate with his peers because every time the child associates with his peers, he’s punished one way or another, aggressive or aggressively. You can’t do that. There’s no way for anyone to really wrap his head around this. Even psychologists will tell you, well, he’s just being careful. The world is very dangerous. So he’s just being protective. And maybe, yeah, he’s a bit overprotective. It’s impossible to communicate the reality inside the bubble of narcissistic abuse. And that is, I think, the victim’s most horrendous predicament, not the abuse itself, because we can withstand, as human beings, we are resilient. We can withstand the most horrible circumstances. We expect to be mistreated.

Many of us, we believe in a hostile world, essentially. So that’s not what breaks people. What breaks people is the inability to communicate the feeling of infinite existential solitude because no one gets what’s happening to you. Not even people on forums of narcissistic abuse.

Each dysfunctional family is writing its own rules. And these are idiosyncratic. They’re unique to that family or to that unit, household. They’re unique.

Each narcissist is very creative at constructing a virtual reality, an alternative universe where there is inverted logic, where things which might horrify outside observers become the norm.

And so you start to feel yourself as a victim being co-opted into the delusion, into the fantasy. You start to support the fantasy. You start to be very defensive and protective.

So sometimes I come across victims who reject when they’re confronted with the incontrovertible evidence that the narcissist is doing bad things to their common children. They reject it. They say, well, I think you’re exaggerating. No, it’s not that bad. It’s not that bad.

They defend the dysfunctional, utterly sick unit, household, family against outsiders because they have been conditioned to do so by the narcissist.

Oh, yes. We can completely understand what you’re saying because I’ve lived that. So let’s move on to your video from 2013, which dealt with your opinion that narcissistic personality disorder parents should be denied custody. I believe you said such a parent should be granted supervised visitation only. Does that opinion still stand in 2022 on that issue? Yes, of course it stands.

Narcissistic personality disorder is an extremely severe mental health disorder. As we would not grant visitation rights, for example, to a parent with active psychosis. Someone who is psychotic disorder is a strong anti-psychotic medication. Normally, the courts would not grant custody to someone like that. Not even visitation. Usually supervised visitation is supervised not by the other parents, by court appointed guardians.

Karen Barrett, who is the forefather, the grandfather of the field, Karen Barrett was the one who had suggested first, and I follow in his footsteps, that narcissistic personality disorder is a form of psychosis. Exactly like borderline personality disorder. These are attenuated forms of psychosis. So it’s a very, very serious, dangerous mental health disorder. It’s not just an arrogant prick, an asshole, or a jerk. It’s not reducing narcissist to this is kind of a collective defense. We don’t want to believe that such people exist.

So we say, oh, come on, you’re exaggerating. It’s just being an asshole, you know, because we don’t dare. We don’t dare confront the alternative that there are people who are subversive, who are evil, who conspire and collude to hurt, manipulateand control other people. We just deny that. We want to believe in the essential goodness of mankind. We deny this.

But narcissist should be denied unbridled access to their children, and they should most definitely be denied custody.

First of all, they are not responsible as parents. They are dangerous. They generate very sick dynamics interpersonally with the child and in the child, intra-psychically in the child. So they should be able to meet the child, to have time with the child, of course, because they are parental figures, but this time should be definitely supervised.

I see no reason to change that. On the very contrary, recent studies, 2020, 2021, we are beginning to realize that what we used to call overt narcissists are actually psychopaths. And so we are beginning to redefine narcissism and to say that a small minority or a minority of narcissists, known as covert narcissists or compensatory narcissists, they are the real narcissists. They are the real narcissists.

But covert narcissists have their own poison. They are passive aggressive. They don’t communicate openly. They’re underhanded. The child has to guess all the time, to walk on eggshells, as to, you know, they have their own kind of…

So no, no kind of narcissist should have custody.

End of story. No kind of psychopath should have custody.

I would go even further. No one with borderline personality should have custody. These are dangerous mental health disorders. End of story.

As we would not give the child to the care of someone with psychotic disorder or schizophrenia, schizophrenia, for example, paranoia, schizophrenia. We would never dream of giving a child to somebody.

And yet, paranoia, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder, is fully controllable with drugs.

You take one pill a day, you’re perfectly okay. And yet we don’t allow these people to have custody.

Narcissism doesn’t have a pill. There’s no pill to cure narcissism. There’s no pill to reverse narcissism or ameliorate or mitigate the dysfunctional and antisocial behaviors of narcissism.

There’s also a thing. We can help the psychotic. We cannot help the narcissist.

So I would say that personality disorders, cluster B personality disorders, are now in a category which is far more sick and dangerous than psychotic disorders, because we know how to treat psychotic disorders with very good results.

Unfortunately, how do you get the narcissistic or the psychopathic parent diagnosed to know and to be able to prove that that that is indeed what they are? That’s the problem.

Only through the courts. But you know, it wouldn’t help you much.

For example, most courts pay very little heed or very little attention to personality disorders as a diagnosis. If you were to come and say, my husband is psychotic, he is schizophrenic, paranoid, he sees people talking to him with their none. He hears voices. The judge would nod and say, well, that’s very dangerous to the child. Yeah, I’m going.

But if you come and say to the judge, my husband is a narcissist. Well, who isn’t? It’s like a socially acceptable norm. Society itself is narcissistic and becoming increasingly more psychopathic. It’s becoming entrenched as a dimension of modernity to be a narcissist, to be selfish, to be egotistical, to consider other people as objects and instruments. There are even scholars who glorify and glamorize narcissism. There are serious scholars like Dutton, like Mokobi, who say that narcissism and psychopathy are positive evolutionary adaptations. We should put them in charge. They’re good leaders. We should make them, we should channel them or render them socially useful in professions like medicine.

So there’s a whole industry around high functioning narcissists, productive narcissists. In 2016, the prestigious British magazine, New Scientists, came up with a cover story. Parents teach your children to be narcissists. I’m kidding you’re not.

I remember that.

But basically, the Cluster B personality disordered parent is going to cause your child inevitable harm. Is what you’re saying. Yes.

That’s the shortest answer you’re going to get.


Okay. I’m not going even to elaborate. Anyone who contests this doesn’t know the first thing about Cluster B. The damage will be severe to all the critical dimension of social functioning and interpersonal relationships in the future. And unfortunately, a lot of it will be irreversible. For example, attachment styles are irreversible. There’s no way to change them once they become entrenched.

So the narcissistic parent teaches the child what we call insecure attachment style. It teaches the child to avoid intimacy, to suspect people, to regard the world as hostile, to be hypervigilant, and so on and so forth. The child grows up is unable to love or to have intimacy or any kind of functional relationship with another person. And that regrettably is not change. It’s not mutable. Cannot be changed.

Cannot be reversed.

So Sam, what are your recommendations for?

I think we limited ourselves to 45 minutes. Shall we make this the last question? Yes.

Thank you. Thank you.

Yes, please. Thank you.

What are your recommendations for target parents who are desperately wanting to reconnect with their children?

You know, what do you recommend to them?

Patience.

There’s very little you can do. As long as the child is exposed to the other parents, the poisoning process will continue. The inoculation against you will continue. And there’s very little you can do about it. And you will not get any support from institutions. If you become too adamant and insistent, you will not even get support from friends and family. They’ll give up on you. They will think you’re obsessed and crazy. They will begin to believe the narcissist over you.

So the only thing, in my view, at least, although online, you can find strategies for coping with parental alienation, many of them, by the way, counterproductive. But the only thing in my view is to show, to demonstrate to the child that the narcissistic parent is not the only kind of parent around, that there is an alternative, that narcissists are not the only type of person you that the child must have must be exposed to a healthy alternative of parenting.

And then in due time, the child makes a choice when it grows up, becomes adolescent, let alone adult. The child makes a choice.

If the child is exposed to a narcissistic parent and to a healthy parent, in the vast majority of cases, around the age of 18 to 21, the child chooses the healthy parent in the vast majority.

However, if you allow the narcissist to convert you into a narcissist, to render you manipulative, to force you to adopt underhanded tactics, to collude in this, he said, she said, narratives and behavior patterns. If you, in other words, get infected with narcissism, then the child has to choose between two narcissistic parents.

And that’s a bad choice. You need to stay centered, boundaried, focused. You need to adhere to your values and respect yourself and you need to act with dignity and you need to foster in the child the realization that, yeah, you can be like, for example, daddy, but you can also be like me. And now you choose.

It also shows the child, it also respects the child. It’s a way of respecting the child, not forcing on the child or imposing on the child any model of personhood, but giving the child the menu to choose from.

And the good news is the overwhelming vast majority of children, when they grow up, they understand what had happened and they usually choose the right side.

So you’re saying the child is on their own journey to figure this out.

Yes. All children are on their own journey to figure this out. Even with two healthy parents, even when the parents are totally healthy, it’s an illusion, a total hallucination to believe that you are shaping your child, that you’re molding him or her, that you are showing her the way.

It’s a parental delusion. It’s very comforting and so on. Children experiment and many of their experiments are exceedingly dangerous and risky. And many of their experiments are going to end up in a lot of pain and hurt, sexual experiments, social experiments, romantic experiments.

Children have to endure life. You can’t protect your child. And if you do, you’re a bad parent.

The main role of a good parent is to push the child away, not to embrace the child, but to push the child away. That’s a good enough parent, because only by pushing the child away, you are forcing the child and legitimizing the attempt to become his or her own person.

The child says, well, I’m going to become my own person and my mother is okay with that. Actually, she encourages me to do this.

Separation individuation comes in two ways.

When the child is 18 months to two years, and when the child is another lesson, and many parents fail in these two phases.

They don’t know the art of separation. They’re too protective. They isolate the child, they isolate the child, they blackmail the child overtly or covertly.

You need to have a modicum. Of course, if you see your child doing drugs, I’m not talking about extreme situations. If you see the child doing drugs, I mean, of course, you should intervene.

Parent, you should have hands-on parenting. But hands-on parenting is not the equivalent of control, not the equivalent of solitary confinement for the child. Hand-on parenting is the vigilant monetary of the child’s experimentation with life.

And then when real danger rears its head, you intervene. If the child stands to experience pain, you do not intervene. Pain is the greatest teacher. The child needs to experience pain. And the child needs to experience some danger. These are great teachers.

And to deny the child this education renders a child an eternal child, which is a very good way of describing a narcissist.

Sam, that’s it for Pop the Red Pill tonight. Thank you very much. Your information has been unbelievable. Thank you for having me.

My name is Kim McCord, and we hope you have learned something valuable tonight and enjoyed your time with us.

Apologies to you, dog. I didn’t mean to do it to him, to her. I’m sorry.

Okay. 10 minutes. Take care. Thank you. And stopping the recording.

Okay.