Gaslighting by Proxy (flying monkeys, triangulation, drama triangle)

Uploaded 3/14/2024, approx. 8 minute read

Summary

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses gaslighting by proxy, where third parties are used to manipulate and distort reality to make the victim doubt their perception. He explains three examples: flying monkeys, triangulation, and the Karpman drama triangle. Flying monkeys collaborate with the abuser to convey misinformation, while triangulation involves introducing a third party to provoke an emotional reaction. The Karpman drama triangle manipulates roles to communicate disinformation. These examples illustrate how gaslighting can occur through the involvement of others, leading to a distorted perception of reality.

Tags

A previous video I’ve made, I suggested a distinction between two types of gaslighting, verbal and behavioral.

You could gaslight someone by talking to them, by prevailing upon them and training them, brainwashing them.

Verbally, language is a powerful weapon.

You can weaponize language.

But another possibility is to behave in ways which convey the wrong information about reality.

This could also alter the mind of your interlocutors or people around you.

You could gaslight by behavior.

You could signal gaslighting.

And so today I’m going to discuss a few variants of behavioral gaslighting and I would put them under the rubric, under the headline, gaslighting by proxy.


When you use other people, third parties, to gaslight someone.

I’ll focus on three examples, flying monkeys, triangulation and the Cartman-Dramaturg tribe.

So let’s put things in order.

You could gaslight someone verbally.

You could gaslight someone by behaving in ways which mislead people into believing the wrong things about reality.

And you could gaslight someone by working with other people, with third parties, to distort reality and to make the victim doubt her judgment and perception of the world.

This is gaslighting by proxy.

Start with flying monkeys.

Flying monkeys usually collaborate with an abuser in order to convey wrong information, misinformation, fake news if you wish.

The main role of flying monkeys is to impose upon the victim an alternative view of what has happened.

Reinterpretation or revisionism of the history of the relationship to somehow make her doubt her memory and any kind of interpretation of the memory.

So that at the end, by the time the flying monkeys are done, the victim becomes highly dependent on other people for her reality testing.

So she’s likely to ask, “Is this real?

Am I just imagining this?

Am I making this up?

Am I crazy?” Flying monkeys are very powerful tools because sometimes the connection between the flying monkeys and the abuser is not known.

They are the long arms of the abuser.

They are secret agents.

And because they pose, flying monkeys pose as objective, as neutral, their power of persuasion is much higher, much stronger than the abusers.

The flying monkeys are a very important weapon in the arsenal of the abuser.

And what they do is essentially gaslighting by proxy.

Triangulation is also a case of gaslighting by proxy.

The triangulator is not really interested in the target of triangulation.

In other words, let’s put it this way.

Triangulation involves introducing a third party into a relationship in order to elicit an emotional reaction from your partner.

So in order to get a rise out of your partner, to provoke some feelings and some reactivity or reactors.

And you do this by introducing a third party, flirting with someone, sleeping with someone, collaborating with someone, and so on and so forth in order to provoke a reaction.

This is of course a form of gaslighting because usually the third party that is introduced into the diet, into the couple, is pretty meaningless.

The person engaged in triangulation doesn’t really care about the third party.

A woman who flirts with another man ostentatiously so as to provoke her partner doesn’t really care about the other men she’s flirting with.

She cares about her partner.

She cares about the emotional reaction of the partner.

She wants to get a rise out of the partner.

A man who visibly and conspicuously teams up with another person in order to provoke his business partner doesn’t really care about that new other person.

The idea is to mold and shape the behavior of his partner, channel it in a way that is helpful and conducive and beneficial to the triangulator.

Interaction falsifies the perception of reality as it provides false information.

The person who is triangulating is conveying misinformation and disinformation.

The person who is triangulating is saying, “This new guy or this new girl or this new partner mean a lot to me.

I am even considering or contemplating abandoning you.” But this is not true because that new partner, that new girl, that new boy, that new person, they mean nothing.

They’re just tools.

They’re just instruments in the triangulation process.

So the information conveyed about them, the information communicated about them is wrong.

And that is, of course, the essence of gaslighting.

Wrong information that reshapes the perception of reality and renders it misperception, attributing retribution, that is erroneous, attributing motives, attributing beliefs, attributing actions, attributing traits in an erroneous way.

In this sense, projection is a form of gaslighting, albeit unconscious.

And finally, the Karpman drama triangle is also a form of gaslighting.

In the Karpman drama triangle, there’s an abuser, a victim, and a rescuer or a savior.

The victim switches or shifts from the abuser to the rescuer or savior.

But as Karpman has noted in his work on the drama triangle, I have a video dedicated to it.

These roles are not fixed.

The victim often becomes an abuser.

The abuser often becomes a victim.

The rescuer and savior could become either or exit the triangle, the equation.

So it’s clear that the drama triangle is manipulative.

Its main aim is to communicate.

But it communicates not information, it communicates disinformation.

The role of the savior and the rescuer is essentially a form of triangulation.

This rescuer and savior is introduced into the triangle as a form of triangulation.

The idea is to triangulate with the savior and the rescuer in order to modify the behavior of the abuser.

But to do so, the abuser needs to be fed the wrong information about the relationship between the victim and the savior or the rescuer.

And because there’s a lot of wrong information communicated, channeled, and conveyed within the drama triangle, the drama triangle is an encapsulation of a private case of gas lighting.

It’s gas lighting, simply.

These are three examples of gas lighting by proxy.

To summarize, gas lighting by proxy is any situation where third parties are used in order to gaslight someone.

They could be flying monkeys, they could be triangulators for people to triangulate with, and they could be rescuers, saviors, and fixers, and healers, especially self-proclaimed ones.

All these cases are gas lighting by proxy.

Have fun. ###

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp

Summary Link:

https://vakninsummaries.com/ (Full summaries of Sam Vaknin’s videos)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/mediakit.html (My work in psychology: Media Kit and Press Room)

Bonus Consultations with Sam Vaknin or Lidija Rangelovska (or both) http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/ctcounsel.html

http://www.youtube.com/samvaknin (Narcissists, Psychopaths, Abuse)

http://www.youtube.com/vakninmusings (World in Conflict and Transition)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com (Malignant Self-love: Narcissism Revisited)

http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/cv.html (Biography and Resume)

Summary

Professor Sam Vaknin discusses gaslighting by proxy, where third parties are used to manipulate and distort reality to make the victim doubt their perception. He explains three examples: flying monkeys, triangulation, and the Karpman drama triangle. Flying monkeys collaborate with the abuser to convey misinformation, while triangulation involves introducing a third party to provoke an emotional reaction. The Karpman drama triangle manipulates roles to communicate disinformation. These examples illustrate how gaslighting can occur through the involvement of others, leading to a distorted perception of reality.

Tags

If you enjoyed this article, you might like the following:

Sam and Lidija: Parents of Narcissistic Abuse Field (with J.S. Wolfe)

In this in-depth discussion, Sam Vaknin and Lydia Rangalowska explored the complexities of narcissistic personality disorder, including its origins, emotional dynamics, and impact on relationships, emphasizing the internalized nature of narcissistic perceptions and behaviors. They highlighted the challenges faced by partners of narcissists, the interplay between different personality disorders, and

Read More »

Parentified Child’s Insecure Attachment: Internal Parents, Rebirth, Hyperintrojection

The speaker discussed the complex insecure attachment psychological dynamics of parentified children, explaining how insecure, regressed parents often infantilize themselves and delegate parental responsibilities to their children, causing these children to assume caregiving roles both externally and internally throughout their lives. They highlighted how even mentally healthy parents can regress

Read More »

Being Alone is Normal, Socializing is Coercive (Loneliness Industry Podcast)

Professor Sam Vaknin discussed how human loneliness, being alone is an inherent condition stemming from the existential trauma of separateness experienced through the gaze of others, with modern technology enabling a choice to embrace isolation via artificial interactions like social media. He emphasized that this technological shift is intentional and

Read More »

Is There Good Narcissism? (The Nerve with Maureen Callahan)

The speaker discussed the concept of narcissism, emphasizing that a certain degree of narcissism is natural and necessary for healthy self-esteem, but can become pathological and harmful. They explained the narcissist’s behavior, awareness of their impact, and the dynamic of the “fantastic space” or fantasy world narcissists create to manipulate

Read More »

Recognize Borderline Personality Disorder in Women and Mothers (The Nerve with Maureen Callahan)

The discussion focused on defining borderline personality disorder (BPD) through key traits such as innate emptiness, emotional dysregulation, suicidal ideation, chronic anger, intense and unstable relationships, and twin anxieties of abandonment and engulfment. It highlighted that not all individuals with BPD exhibit every trait, using personal childhood examples to illustrate

Read More »

Bipolar Disorders Not Borderline Personality Disorder!

The discussion centered on distinguishing between bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder (BPD), emphasizing that bipolar mood cycles are long and predictable, while BPD mood shifts are rapid and unpredictable. The impact of a borderline mother on a child was highlighted, particularly the child’s internalization of blame and the inability

Read More »

Types of Narcissism: It Takes All Kinds (The Nerve with Maureen Callahan)

The discussion focused on the concept of covert narcissism, describing three types: the inverted narcissist, the pro-social communal narcissist, and the envious covert narcissist, emphasizing their subtle and often undetectable manipulative behaviors. The speaker highlighted the difficulty in identifying covert narcissists compared to overt narcissists and explained the severe psychological

Read More »

Selfish or Narcissist? (The Nerve with Maureen Callahan)

The discussion focused on the psychological dynamics between narcissists and their non-narcissist partners, emphasizing the powerful self-delusions and cyclical patterns such as idealization, devaluation, and discard. It highlighted how narcissists impair their partners’ reality testing, isolate them from support systems, and create emotional dependence through shared, controlling fantasies. The conversation

Read More »

It’s Okay To Say: Mother Is The Problem (The Nerve with Maureen Callahan)

Sam and Maureen Callahan discussed the challenges faced by individuals with borderline or dysfunctional mothers, highlighting two main issues: negative messaging that instills feelings of unworthiness and the mother’s tendency to set the child up for failure. Children dealing with such mothers often internalize the blame, believing they are the

Read More »